Back to Feed
Software

T3 vs T2 EC2: Save Costs and Avoid CPU Throttling in AWS

dev.to
sanjay yadav
May 8, 2026
3 min read
Original
****In many AWS accounts we still see T2 instances running production workloads. Most of the time, this isn’t by choice. It’s usually inheritance — old templates, old AMIs, or “this is what we launched years ago”. The issue here is: you are likely paying more money for worse performance.--- ** When AWS introduced T2 instances, burstable compute was a solid idea. You received: A low baseline CPU CPU credits earned during idle time The ability to burst when needed For small, spiky workloads, this model worked well enough at the time. T2 became the default for running applications on top of ec2 instances.--- ** Over time, several issues became obvious. In real environments: Baseline CPU performance is low CPU credits accumulate slowly Unlimited bursting costs extra Performance becomes unpredictable under sustained load In most teams, this shows up as mysterious CPU throttling, even though the instance size “should” be enough.--- ** T3 instances are not just a pricing refresh. They are built on AWS Nitro, which fundamentally improves how compute is delivered. The result is: Higher baseline CPU Faster CPU credit earning More consistent performance Lower cost for equivalent instance sizes This is why AWS positions T3 as the replacement for T2.--- ** CPU Credit Behavior (High Level) The key difference is not just bursting — it’s how quickly credits are earned and how predictable performance is once credits are spent. For the same workload: T2 often ends up more expensive T3 delivers better throughput Unlimited bursting on T2 adds surprise costs Once sustained CPU usage enters the picture, T2 stops being economical very quickly.--- If you are running: APIs Background workers Small application servers Internal tooling T3 will almost always behave better under real traffic patterns. In practice, many teams switch to T3 and immediately notice fewer CPU-related alerts without changing instance size.--- ** There is no special configuration required to use T3. From an operations perspective: IAM remains unchanged Monitoring stays the same Autoscaling behavior improves due to more stable CPU usage ** Migrating from T2 to T3 is usually straightforward: Ensure your AMI supports Nitro-based instances Launch a T3 instance of the same size Observe CPU credit behavior and latency Roll out gradually if the workload is critical Use T3 When: Launching new workloads Running general-purpose services Cost efficiency matters You want predictable burst behavior Use T2 Only When: You are stuck with legacy AMIs Nitro is not supported Migration is temporarily impossible Even then, T2 should be treated as a short-term compromise. ** ** - Is T3 cheaper than T2 in AWS EC2? In most real-world scenarios, T3 instances are more cost-efficient than T2. They offer improved baseline performance and flexible CPU credit usage, which helps reduce unexpected costs. - What are CPU credits in T2 and T3 instances? CPU credits allow burstable instances to handle temporary spikes in usage. T2 instances have stricter credit limits, while T3 provides more flexible credit options, making it better for variable workloads. - When should I choose T3 over T2? You should choose T3 when your workload requires consistent performance or occasional bursts. T3 is generally better for modern applications due to its cost-performance balance. ** If you're exploring DevOps, Kubernetes, and cloud infrastructure, these guides will help you go deeper: How Kubernetes Routes Pod Traffic with a Single Egress IP GP3 vs GP2 EBS Volumes: Performance and Cost Comparison How to Set Up a Self-Hosted GitHub Actions Runner These articles cover Kubernetes networking, AWS storage optimization, and CI/CD infrastructure — useful when scaling beyond local development environments. ** T2 instances are effectively legacy at this point. T3 instances are cheaper, faster, and operationally simpler. For anything new, T3 should be the default. T2 should exist only where history forces it to. That single decision can quietly reduce cost and eliminate an entire class of performance issues.